Claim 03ddd09eChecked 09 Jul 2026
TrueOn the truth scale
We were not earning a lot of money for doing nothing.
Nigel Farage·Nigel Farage - High Profiles·ArticleFactual · historical current chronological
Reasoning & Evidence09 Jul 2026
Public evidence about the 1980s City supports Farage’s point: a House of Commons banking-standards submission says investment-banking transactions required "immense concentration of time and effort" and teams often worked "very long hours"; an Oxford academic history says the 1980s City was built around performance-related compensation and quick, short lines of management; and a contemporaneous TIME report described the market as increasingly round-the-clock and highly paid. That makes the claim that they were not earning a lot of money for doing nothing accurate. Sources: House of Commons Parliamentary Commission on Banking Standards (Sir Alan Budd evidence); Oxford Academic / Oxford University Press chapter on the City’s 1980s transformation; TIME, "Bang-Up Time in London." (publications.parliament.uk)
From article
Well, precisely. Precisely. And no accountability whatsoever. Life in the City in the Eighties was enormous fun, but were you accountable? Yes. If the transactions that you were involved in went wrong and you took big losses, you were out of the door. I’ve seen people asked to leave the office immediately. And don’t tell me that we were earning a lot of money for doing nothing! When it was busy, my goodness me! it was busy. You can’t imagine the pressure.
Sources opened+ 36 search hits considered
[1]publications.parliament.uk
https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/jt201314/jtselect/jtpcbs/27/27iv26.htm
Prev · F48CEA7A193 / 361 in this article · ← →Next · 00A526B1