Claim 17e0b1c6Checked 09 Jul 2026
PlausibleOn the evidence scale
“If the transactions you were involved in went wrong and you took big losses, you were out of the door.”
Reasoning & Evidence09 Jul 2026
Contemporary evidence supports this as a plausible description of late-1980s City culture, but not as a universal rule. A 1987 Washington Post report on the City’s post-Big Bang “shakeout” said firms were laying off staff after securities losses, and another Washington Post report said Citicorp’s London trading chief resigned after losses and policy violations. A later Guardian retrospective on the old City likewise recalled a performance culture in which failure could mean being fired. But these sources show a strong tendency toward accountability and job losses after bad trading, not that every bad transaction automatically meant immediate dismissal. Sources: The Washington Post, “After ‘Big Bang,’ A Big Shakeout”; The Washington Post, “Citicorp Said to Suffer Trading Losses”; The Guardian, “Special report: an outsider’s guide to the City of London.”
From article
Well, precisely. Precisely. And no accountability whatsoever. Life in the City in the Eighties was enormous fun, but were you accountable? Yes. If the transactions that you were involved in went wrong and you took big losses, you were out of the door. I’ve seen people asked to leave the office immediately.
And don’t tell me that we were earning a lot of money for doing nothing! When it was busy, my goodness me! it was busy. You can’t imagine the pressure.
Sources opened+ 111 search hits considered
| [1] | upi.com |
| [2] | theguardian.com |
| [3] | washingtonpost.com |