The claim has two components: (1) that the government is delivering savings for "family fun days out this summer," and (2) that "the right hon. Gentleman" has not done more to welcome them. On the first component, there is clear official evidence. The UK government launched the "Great British Summer Savings" scheme, running from 25 June to 1 September 2026, which temporarily cuts VAT from 20% to 5% on eligible family activities including soft play centres, theme parks, zoos, cinemas, children's theatre tickets, and children's meals in restaurants. The scheme also provides free bus travel for children aged 5–15 in England throughout August. The government estimates the cost at about £300 million. So the savings are real and being delivered. On the second component, the claim is a political characterization of an opponent's behaviour. From the search results, the Conservative opposition and commentators have publicly criticised the scheme rather than welcomed it — for instance, a Conservative response described it as "a gimmick," and media coverage noted criticism that the savings are small. This suggests the opposition has indeed not welcomed the savings, which is broadly consistent with the claim. However, whether someone has "done more to welcome" something is inherently a subjective political judgment rather than a hard, independently verifiable fact. There is also some ambiguity about exactly which MP "the right hon. Gentleman" refers to in this exchange (the parliamentary language "right hon. Gentleman" typically denotes a male MP, while the Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch is female, so the remark may have been directed at a different MP in the exchange). Taking these together: the underlying factual basis — that savings are being delivered for family days out — is true and well-documented. The assertion that the political opponent has not welcomed them is consistent with available evidence but is a political framing rather than a strictly verifiable fact, and the identity of "the right hon. Gentleman" adds ambiguity. The mix of verifiable fact and subjective political characterization makes this partly true and partly a matter of political interpretation. Sources: - GOV.UK, "Great British Summer Savings: VAT slashed to save families money on days out" — https://www.gov.uk/government/news/great-british-summer-savings-vat-slashed-to-save-families-money-on-days-out - GOV.UK, "Great British Summer Savings: Major businesses pass on VAT cut to families on days out" — https://www.gov.uk/government/news/great-british-summer-savings-major-businesses-pass-on-vat-cut-to-families-on-days-out - UK Parliament Hansard, "Engagements — 3 June 2026" — https://hansard.parliament.uk/commons/2026-06-03/debates/051DBB77-8D86-47FD-91B3-95DD68A17CC0/Engagements - YouTube, "PMQs LIVE: Prime Minister's Questions - 3 June 2026" (UK Parliament channel) — https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NY5xo9bwsdM - The Independent, "Is Rachel Reeves's ultra-mini Budget an attempt to save her job?" — https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/politics-explained/rachel-reeves-oil-tax-summer-savings-b2981337.html - GB News, "'A GIMMICK!' | Labour Business Secretary GRILLED over Rachel Reeves' summer saving scheme measures" — https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NNqM_xIehxM