Claim 5a4a90fd
Not RatedValue judgement
Not assessed for accuracy.
“Mr and Mrs Woodcock should receive answers about what happened to Holly.”
The claim asserts that Mr and Mrs Woodcock ought to receive answers, expressing a normative expectation rather than a testable fact or causal relationship. It is therefore stored but not assessed further.
Reasoning & Evidence03 Jun 2026
Not assessed for accuracy — categorized as a value judgement or prediction.
From speech
Q11. I echo the comments the Prime Minister just made. In August 2024, my constituent Holly Woodcock was found deceased in France aged 20 years old. Her parents Lee and Joanna, who are in the Gallery, still have no idea what happened at Holly’s friend’s holiday villa. They have raised significant concerns with the Foreign Office regarding the investigation, including the inconsistencies in witness statements and timelines, how samples were prematurely destroyed and how matters raised by French lawyers were dismissed by the investigating French police officers and officials. I am grateful that a Foreign Office Minister met me and Mr Woodcock, but I share the family’s concerns that our Government should do more to press the French authorities to reopen the investigation. Will the Prime Minister commit to look at what can be done to raise the matter with his French counterparts at the highest level to help Mr and Mrs Woodcock get the answers that their daughter Holly deserves?
Sources opened
No source documents opened.