Claim 6f0e87fcChecked 09 Jul 2026
FalseOn the truth scale
There was no accountability whatsoever.
Nigel Farage·Nigel Farage - High Profiles·ArticleFactual · historical current chronological
Reasoning & Evidence09 Jul 2026
The claim is too absolute. Official Bank of England material describes the early-1980s City regime as a "light-handed regulatory regime," not a system with no oversight at all, and the 1986 reforms were designed to create an "open but well-regulated financial centre." (bankofengland.co.uk) The Financial Services Act 1986 also defined self-regulating organisations as bodies that enforce binding rules, including rules on admission and expulsion of members, which is clear evidence of accountability mechanisms. (legislation.gov.uk) So while the City may have had limited or informal accountability in practice, "there was no accountability whatsoever" overstates the reality and is false. Sources: Bank of England, "Regulation in financial markets"; Bank of England, "City regulation after Big Bang"; Financial Services Act 1986 (legislation.gov.uk).
From article
Well, precisely. Precisely. And no accountability whatsoever. Life in the City in the Eighties was enormous fun, but were you accountable? Yes. If the transactions that you were involved in went wrong and you took big losses, you were out of the door. I’ve seen people asked to leave the office immediately. And don’t tell me that we were earning a lot of money for doing nothing! When it was busy, my goodness me! it was busy. You can’t imagine the pressure.
Sources opened+ 18 search hits considered
[1]bankofengland.co.uk
https://www.bankofengland.co.uk/quarterly-bulletin/1986/q1/city-regulation-after-big-bang---governors-speech-to-the-american-chamber-of-commerce-uk
[2]bankofengland.co.uk
https://www.bankofengland.co.uk/quarterly-bulletin/1983/q4/regulation-in-financial-markets---speech-by-mr-d-a-walker
Prev · 39A245FC188 / 361 in this article · ← →Next · 7F010FF4