The claim is about what a private individual (Hannah) said in what appears to be a private communication with her MP. The only evidence is Collins' own account. No independent source — no public statement by Hannah, no interview, no published letter — corroborates Hannah's actual words. We can confirm that Collins *reported* Hannah saying similar things, but we cannot independently verify what Hannah actually said. Additionally, there is a notable difference between what Collins quoted Hannah as saying in February ("I have never considered living in Harpenden in the future, because it would be far too expensive to buy a place to live") and the PMQs paraphrase ("will have to leave the place where she grew up"). Hannah's reported statement was about not *considering* living there in the future due to cost; Collins' PMQs version frames this as Hannah saying she *will have to leave*. These are related but not identical — one is about future prospects and the other implies forced departure. However, since the core of the claim rests on a private communication between a constituent and an MP — information that is not public and cannot be independently corroborated or contradicted — the appropriate verdict is not-enough-evidence. Sources: Parallel Parliament (Westminster Hall debate, 24 Feb 2026, https://www.parallelparliament.co.uk/debate/2026-02-24/commons/westminster-hall/local-transport-planning-developments); St Albans Times (https://stalbanstimes.co.uk/harpenden/harpenden-mp-challenges-prime-minister-over-housing-targets/); Hemel Today (https://www.hemeltoday.co.uk/news/opinion/political-opinion-victoria-collins-mp-demands-infrastructure-first-planning-securing-parliament-debate-5618779); Victoria Collins MP website (https://www.victoriacollins.uk/news/article/victoria-collins-mp-invites-prime-minister-to-the-impact-of-housing-targets)