The official Terms of Reference for the Timms Review, published on GOV.UK, contain a passage in the "Principles" section stating: "the purpose of the Review is to ensure that PIP is fair and fit for the future rather than to generate proposals for further savings. However, the sustainability of the system is an important consideration and so the Review will operate within the OBR's projections for future PIP expenditure, to ensure it is there to support generations to come." This nearly verbatim matches Mrs Badenoch's claim that the Timms review's terms of reference explicitly say it is "not about generating proposals for further savings." One important qualification: the very next sentence in the same bullet point notes that "the sustainability of the system is an important consideration" and that the Review will "operate within the OBR's projections for future PIP expenditure." This means the terms of reference do not ignore cost entirely — they constrain recommendations to fit within existing fiscal forecasts. However, Badenoch's specific factual claim — that the terms of reference state the review is not about generating proposals for further savings — is directly and explicitly confirmed by the primary source. The additional context about sustainability does not contradict the claim; it qualifies it, but the claim itself is accurately reported. Sources: GOV.UK, "Timms Review of Personal Independence Payment: Terms of Reference" — https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/timms-review-of-pip-terms-of-reference/timms-review-of-personal-independence-payment-terms-of-reference ; GOV.UK PDF of Terms of Reference — https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/690215c7918e1f940b3cf7f6/timms-review-of-pip-terms-of-reference.pdf