Claim bc775cfeChecked 21 Jul 2026
TrueOn the truth scale
The UK can choose its relationship with America.
Nigel Farage·Nigel Farage - High Profiles·ArticleFactual · historical current chronological
Reasoning & Evidence21 Jul 2026
In formal constitutional terms, the UK is a sovereign nation and retains the legal authority to make its own foreign policy decisions, including whether to enter into treaties and whether to commit to military action. The UK's 2003 Iraq invasion was subject to a parliamentary vote (the government motion passed 412–149 on 18 March 2003), demonstrating that the decision to go to war was a UK sovereign choice — Parliament was not compelled by any external body. The UK–US extradition treaty of 2003 was negotiated and entered into UK law through domestic legislation (the Extradition Act 2003), again a sovereign act. The UK also chose not to participate in the Vietnam War, demonstrating that it can decline to join US military adventures. However, Farage's framing presents the relationship as one of unconstrained free choice, which oversimplifies the reality. The UK has significant structural dependencies on the US — intelligence sharing (Five Eyes), nuclear deterrent maintenance (Trident missiles), and military interoperability — that constrain practical policy choices. Critics have long argued that the "special relationship" creates substantial pressure to align with US foreign policy, and the UK's choices in practice have often reflected this alignment rather than genuine independence. The UK's decision to join the Iraq War, for instance, was widely seen as driven by the desire to maintain the special relationship with the US rather than an independent assessment. Still, the core assertion — that the UK retains sovereign decision-making authority over its relationship with America, including the ability to choose whether to sign treaties and go to war — is formally and legally accurate. The UK is not bound by any supranational institution in this relationship; it enters into bilateral arrangements as a sovereign state. The claim captures a real distinction between the US relationship (bilateral, sovereign) and the EU relationship (multilateral, with shared/ceded decision-making in certain areas). Sources: - BBC News, "Blair wins war backing amid revolt" (March 18, 2003) — http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_politics/2862325.stm - UK Parliament Hansard, Iraq debate (March 18, 2003) — https://api.parliament.uk/historic-hansard/commons/2003/mar/18/iraq - UK Parliament Commons Library, "Parliamentary approval for military action" — https://commonslibrary.parliament.uk/research-briefings/cbp-7166/ - Wikipedia, "UK–US extradition treaty of 2003" — https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UK%E2%80%93US_extradition_treaty_of_2003 - UK Parliament, "UK/US Extradition Treaty 2003" report — https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld201415/ldselect/ldextradition/126/12614.htm
From article
That is something that Nick Clegg puts up occasionally, but it is not something that any of us desire or want at all. Our relationship with America – you know, we can choose. We can choose whether or not we sign extradition treaties or go to war. What we’re doing with Euope is giving away the ability to make those decisions.
Sources opened
[1]ecfr.eu
https://ecfr.eu/article/escaping-the-special-relationship-how-britain-can-leave-its-dangerous-dependency-on-trumps-america/
[2]the-independent.com
https://www.the-independent.com/news/uk/politics/trump-uk-us-iran-starmer-national-security-b2946343.html
[3]the-independent.com
https://www.the-independent.com/news/uk/home-news/yvette-cooper-donald-trump-keir-starmer-tony-blair-laura-kuenssberg-b2934226.html
[4]newstatesman.com
https://www.newstatesman.com/international-politics/geopolitics/2026/01/britain-needs-its-own-foreign-policy-not-americas
[5]lrb.co.uk
https://www.lrb.co.uk/blog/2026/may/dependency-culture
[6]en.wikipedia.org
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UK%E2%80%93US_extradition_treaty_of_2003
[7]publications.parliament.uk
https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld201415/ldselect/ldextradition/126/12614.htm
[8]statewatch.org
http://www.statewatch.org/news/2003/july/statewatch-news-online-new-uk-us-extradition-treaty-special-report-no-2/
[9]congress.gov
https://www.congress.gov/crs_external_products/RL/PDF/RL32096/RL32096.5.pdf
[10]assets.publishing.service.gov.uk
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5a7b82f240f0b62826a040d3/7146.pdf
[11]api.parliament.uk
https://api.parliament.uk/historic-hansard/commons/2003/mar/18/iraq
[12]commonslibrary.parliament.uk
https://commonslibrary.parliament.uk/research-briefings/cbp-7166/
[13]agora-parl.org
https://www.agora-parl.org/sites/default/files/agora-documents/Democratic%20Audit%20-%20Parliamentary%20Oversight%20of%20British%20Foreign%20Policy%20-%20EN%20-%20PI.pdf
[14]news.bbc.co.uk
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_politics/2862325.stm
[15]publicwhip.org.uk
https://www.publicwhip.org.uk/division.php?date=2003-03-18&number=118
Prev · D9CEAF03345 / 405 in this article · ← →Next · 9BB00A0C