Claim de532e54Checked 21 Jul 2026
TrueOn the truth scale
“Libertarianism can be taken to extremes that people find offensive.”
Reasoning & Evidence21 Jul 2026
The claim is a general philosophical observation: that libertarianism, as a political philosophy, can be taken to extremes that people find offensive. This is a well-supported and uncontroversial statement.
There is abundant evidence that extreme applications of libertarian principles have produced positions widely regarded as offensive:
- **Murray Rothbard**, a founding figure of anarcho-capitalist libertarianism, argued that parents should have the legal right to let their children starve to death, since imposing an obligation to feed them would be coercive. This is documented in his book *The Ethics of Liberty* and widely discussed.
- **Robert Nozick**, in *Anarchy, State, and Utopia* (1974), accepted the possibility of voluntary contractual slavery as a logical extension of self-ownership and freedom of contract — a position many find deeply offensive.
- **Ayn Rand**, a libertarian icon, defended the colonization and displacement of Native Americans, calling them "savages" who had no right to the land because they did not respect individual property rights.
- Prominent libertarians including **Ron Paul** opposed the Civil Rights Act of 1964 on libertarian grounds, arguing that business owners should have the right to discriminate.
- Academic critics like **Matt Zwolinski** have documented how Rothbardian libertarianism, taken to its logical conclusion, could produce a society "indistinguishable from a totalitarian dictatorship" so long as no property rights were technically violated.
These examples demonstrate that libertarianism, when consistently applied to its extreme conclusions, yields positions that many people — including many libertarians themselves — find offensive. Farage's claim is not that libertarianism *is* offensive, but that it *can be taken to extremes* that people find offensive, which is plainly accurate.
Sources: The Ethics Centre, "Libertarianism and the limits of freedom" (https://ethics.org.au/libertarianism-and-the-limits-of-freedom/); Salon, "The 7 strangest libertarian ideas" (https://www.salon.com/2014/09/03/the_7_strangest_libertarian_ideas_partner/); Matt Zwolinski, "Libertarianism, Oversimplified," The Independent Review (https://www.independent.org/pdf/tir/tir_28_4_03_zwolinski.pdf); Encyclopedia Britannica, "Libertarianism - Contemporary Libertarianism" (https://www.britannica.com/topic/libertarianism-politics/Contemporary-libertarianism); Salon, "Libertarian superstar Ayn Rand defended Native American genocide" (https://www.salon.com/2015/10/14/libertarian_superstar_ayn_rand_defended_genocide_of_savage_native_americans/)
From article
I mean, libertarianism is a very difficult subject to discuss because you can take it to extremes that people find offensive. But I do think that Ukip is a libertarian political movement compared with the mob over the road in Westminster, who seem to want to control absolutely everything. I think we need less government, not more.
Sources opened
| [1] | salon.com |
| [2] | ethics.org.au |
| [3] | mattbruenig.com |
| [4] | web.archive.org |
| [5] | salon.com |
| [6] | damonlinker.substack.com |
| [7] | independent.org |
| [8] | britannica.com |
| [9] | currentaffairs.org |