Claim e5a9389b
Not RatedValue judgement
Not assessed for accuracy.
Those actions were catastrophic errors of judgement.
The claim is an assessment of the actions’ quality and seriousness, calling them ‘catastrophic errors of judgement.’ That is a value judgment about how bad the decisions were, not a directly testable factual or causal assertion.
Nigel Farage·Nigel Farage - High Profiles·ArticleJudgement · evaluative
Reasoning & Evidence
Not assessed for accuracy — categorized as a value judgement or prediction.
From article
But they were allowed to. Who let them do it? Moronic politicians, who changed rules we’d had for seven decades. Take America – [Alan] Greenspan got rid of the Glass-Steagall Act.5The Banking Act of 1933, which separated investment banking from commercial banks. Its effectual repeal in 1999 allowed Wall Street to gamble with money deposited in commercial banks. Look what that moron [Gordon] Brown did! He took away control of the banking industry from the Bank of England and gave it to a bunch of tick-box bureaucrats at the [Financial Services Authority]. Catastrophic, catastrophic errors of judgement!
Sources opened
No source documents opened.
Prev · 782312A7224 / 361 in this article · ← →Next · 2A5778D9