Claim e7afb3be
Not RatedValue judgement
Not assessed for accuracy.
The Government should respond to the Hughes report.
The claim asserts that the Government has an obligation to respond to the Hughes report, which is a normative statement about what should happen rather than a testable fact.
Sarah GreenLiberal DemocratLD / Chesham and Amersham·Engagements·03 Jun 2026Judgement · normative
Reasoning & Evidence03 Jun 2026
Not assessed for accuracy — categorized as a value judgement or prediction.
From speech
Q8. Yesterday, at an event here in Parliament, I spoke to women whose children suffered avoidable harm after they continued taking the epilepsy drug sodium valproate during pregnancy. Doctors knew the risks and patients were not informed, and that has had devastating consequences. I am sure that the Prime Minister would agree that the fact that a Government Department commissioned a report looking at how to provide a redress scheme raised an expectation that one was on the horizon. To then not introduce such a scheme would be unbelievably cruel. When will this Government respond to the Hughes report and finally establish a redress scheme for the families?
Sources opened
No source documents opened.
Prev · FA2FDC36459 / 578 in this debate · ← →Next · F2773679