Claim fa2fdc36
Not RatedValue judgement
Not assessed for accuracy.
Not introducing such a redress scheme would be unbelievably cruel.
The claim morally condemns the non-introduction of a redress scheme as cruel, expressing a value judgment about what would be wrong or unjustified rather than a testable fact or causal relationship. Judgement claims are stored but not assessed further.
Sarah GreenLiberal DemocratLD / Chesham and Amersham·Engagements·03 Jun 2026Judgement · normative
Reasoning & Evidence03 Jun 2026
Not assessed for accuracy — categorized as a value judgement or prediction.
From speech
Q8. Yesterday, at an event here in Parliament, I spoke to women whose children suffered avoidable harm after they continued taking the epilepsy drug sodium valproate during pregnancy. Doctors knew the risks and patients were not informed, and that has had devastating consequences. I am sure that the Prime Minister would agree that the fact that a Government Department commissioned a report looking at how to provide a redress scheme raised an expectation that one was on the horizon. To then not introduce such a scheme would be unbelievably cruel. When will this Government respond to the Hughes report and finally establish a redress scheme for the families?
Sources opened
No source documents opened.
Prev · 251FA530458 / 578 in this debate · ← →Next · E7AFB3BE