Nigel Farage

Reform UKClacton@Nigel_Farage

CLAIMS

365

ASSESSED

269

ACCURACY

73%· 192 rated claims

All · 365 Hansard · 14 Tweets · 31 Articles · 320

Tweets accuracy86%· 22 rated claims

Claims31 CLAIMS

TWEET23 JUN 2026True

“Additional spending by a local non-party campaigner counts towards the candidate's spending limit.”

Tweet context →

TWEET23 JUN 2026True

“Hope Not Hate described a rapid-response plan involving local organising, targeted leafleting and digital adverts to challenge Reform from the start.”

Tweet context →

TWEET23 JUN 2026Not Enough Evidence

“Nigel Farage was still awaiting a substantive response to Lee Anderson MP's 11 June letter concerning potential Purdah breaches during the Makerfield election.”

Tweet context →

TWEET23 JUN 2026Not Enough Evidence

“Hope Not Hate's spending therefore needed to be authorised by Andy Burnham's campaign.”

Tweet context →

TWEET23 JUN 2026True

“A local non-party campaigner cannot spend more than the permitted sum without the candidate's written authorisation.”

Tweet context →

TWEET23 JUN 2026True

“Hope Not Hate Ltd is a registered third-party campaigner.”

Tweet context →

TWEET23 JUN 2026Not Enough Evidence

“Hope Not Hate's expenses could not have remained below £700.”

Tweet context →

TWEET23 JUN 2026Plausible

“Public trust in elections depends on everyone following the rules.”

Tweet context →

TWEET23 JUN 2026Not Enough Evidence

“Those payments appear not to have been registered.”

Tweet context →

TWEET23 JUN 2026True

“Hope Not Hate published at least two leaflets in Makerfield.”

Tweet context →

TWEET23 JUN 2026True

“Under the Political Parties, Elections and Referendums Act, money lent to a recognised third-party campaigner otherwise than on commercial terms is treated as a donation.”

Tweet context →

TWEET23 JUN 2026True

“Hope Not Hate's leaflets before the Makerfield by-election were clearly directed at encouraging voters to support Andy Burnham over Rob Kenyon.”

Tweet context →

TWEET23 JUN 2026False

“Those payments should have been registered under current guidance.”

Tweet context →

TWEET23 JUN 2026Not Rated

“There are serious questions about whether the loan was provided on commercial terms.”

Tweet context →

TWEET23 JUN 2026True

“One of those leaflets was a personal letter written by Carol Vorderman.”

Tweet context →

TWEET23 JUN 2026True

“Nigel Farage demanded an investigation into potential electoral-law breaches by Hope Not Hate.”

Tweet context →

TWEET23 JUN 2026True

“Electoral Commission guidance states that local non-party campaigners can spend up to £700 on campaigning for or against a candidate.”

Tweet context →

TWEET23 JUN 2026Not Enough Evidence

“Hope Not Hate may have breached electoral law.”

Tweet context →

TWEET23 JUN 2026True

“Hope Not Hate's adverts warned that Reform was trying to divide Greater Manchester.”

Tweet context →

TWEET23 JUN 2026Not Enough Evidence

“Hope Not Hate's Facebook page incurred thousands of pounds in advertising spend during the month before the by-election.”

Tweet context →

TWEET23 JUN 2026Not Rated

“Hope Not Hate's spending should count towards Andy Burnham's total campaign spending.”

Tweet context →

TWEET23 JUN 2026True

“Nigel Farage believes Hope Not Hate's leaflet spending accrued on behalf of the Burnham campaign.”

Tweet context →

TWEET23 JUN 2026Not Rated

“The grants should have been reserved for charitable purposes rather than political campaigning.”

Tweet context →

TWEET23 JUN 2026True

“Hope Not Hate's 2024 annual report stated that the company received grants totalling £787,858 from Hope Not Hate Charitable Trust to carry out its assignments.”

Tweet context →

TWEET23 JUN 2026Partly True/False

“Hope Not Hate and its associated charitable trust, now called Hope Unlimited, are highly integrated.”

Tweet context →

← NewerPage 1 of 2Older →

Verdict DistributionTWEETS

Factual · Truth

True

67%

Partly True/False

False

Not Enough Evidence

22%

Causal · Support

Strongly Supported

Plausible

100%

Weak Evidence

Unsupported

Not Enough Evidence